AI Literacy: so your team uses AI tools safely and competently.

For the basics yes, for the obligation usually not. Article 4 requires measures taking into account their technical knowledge, experience, education and training and the context the AI systems are to be used in, and considering the persons or groups of persons on whom the AI systems are to be used. Context and affected groups are in the statute, not in our offering. The statute explicitly names the context in which the AI systems are deployed and the groups of people they are used on. An off-the-shelf training can know neither: it does not know which systems you run, what data goes into them, who works with them, and who is affected by the results. So we look at your processes first and cut the training to them. Which systems you run and who is affected is settled by the EU AI Act compliance audit; the in-house workshop then works with your real processes instead of invented examples.

Article 4 of the EU AI Act has required providers and deployers since 2 February 2025 to take measures for the AI literacy of their staff and of other persons dealing with AI systems on their behalf. The Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, has been in force since 27 July 2026 and turned this into a duty of effort: you have to act, but you do not have to guarantee a particular level of competence for any individual. In practice that means a documented training concept, cut to roles and risks, rather than a certificate for everyone. Whoever trains should be able to show who was trained, on what, and when. How far that has to reach in your case depends on who works with what: that is settled by the EU AI Act compliance audit, while this course covers the competence build-up.

Conditions are sent on request. Scope follows the number of participants, the format, and the preparation involved. We name concrete figures in our reply to your inquiry.

Through the form or directly by email. You will receive a personal reply within 24 hours with conditions and dates. We discuss whether the online module format or the in-house workshop fits better.

The training is cut to the competence areas Article 4 addresses: how the systems work, their risks, and how to assess output. The participation record documents who was trained, on what, and when. Whether your measures are sufficient overall depends on your systems and roles; that is settled by the EU AI Act compliance audit.

The online module is asynchronous: each person learns at their own pace, with individual progress through modules. The in-house workshop is on-site or remote-live: 1 day focused at a stretch, team discussion, exercises from your daily work. Content is identical; the in-house format is especially useful when you want to bring an entire team to the same level.

They work with AI systems too, and belong in the group you build competence for. How much is enough depends on the role and the use. The training is structured so that occasional users can take away the essential content in 1 to 2 hours.